Discusses Different Types Of Research Methods †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Discusses Different Types Of Research Methods. Answer: Introduction The research methodology is an important aspect of the research process. It discusses different types of research methods and selects the most appropriate research method for the research. The research is the process in which the researcher has to take into consideration several aspects such as the research paradigm, research design and the research approach (Merriam Tisdell, 2015). In the present, a research has been conducted on the impact of employee turnover on the staff productivity. In essence, the researcher has examined different types of research approach or design and proposed the most appropriate research approach or design for the research process. Research Methods It is important to select the research paradigm before starting the research. The post positivism research paradigm will be used in the research process to conduct the interview. It is the paradigm which states that the research is independent of the researcher. The positivism states that there is independence between the researcher and the researched object. However, post-positivism accepts that the perception, bias, knowledge and values of the researcher can influence the observed case. The post-positivism pursues objectivity by understanding that different external forces impacts on the outcomes of the research (Graue, 2015). In the present research, post-positivsm research method is used as it is considered that researcher cannot be separated from the research. It means that the personal perception and bias of the researcher cannot be separated from research (Lewis, 2015). It will impact the research outcomes as well as the research process. Moreover, qualitative research method is used in which the researcher interprets the collected data. Therefore, data and researcher cannot be separated. The interview method will be selected along with the post-positivism approach. The interview is the most common form of collecting qualitative data. It is a primary research method, which means that the researcher directly collects the data required for the research. The interview method collects qualitative data, which means that the data cannot be obtained through statistical means. The interview can be divided into semi-structured, structured and unstructured questionnaire method. In the structured method, the questions which will be asked in the interview are previously determined. In the semi-structured interview, the interview questionnaire is not formed; however, the direction of the interview is determined (Kallio, Pietil, Johnson Kangasniemi, 2016). In unstructured interview, the interviewer do not form the questionnaire asks questions according to the situation. The researcher is using structured interview, as it will ease the whole research process. The researcher does not have vast experience in research and using other methods, he can deviate from the research objective. The researcher will adopt the approach of ethnography to conduct the research process. Ethnography is the systematic study of a cultural phenomenon. It is the study in which the researcher observes the problem and presents them in the perception of the observed samples. Methodology Research methods refer to the process through which the data is collected from different sources. In qualitative data collection, the data is collected from qualitative sources. The qualitative data is the data which cannot be evaluated by statistical methods. The qualitative data is collected from interview method. In the present research, interview method will be used. An interview will be conducted from one hotel supervisor. The hotel supervisor has handles all the day-to-day operations and; is aware of the employee absenteeism and turnover. He has to manage the workforce; therefore, must be aware of the techniques, which can foster employee productivity. Population and Sampling technique The interview method will be used to collect the data from the research participants. The interview will be collected with a hotel supervisor and six questions will be asked with the supervisor. Only one supervisor is selected for the research due to the time window and the limited budget. Interview is a labor-intensive task; therefore, significant time will be consumed in arranging and conducting the interview. The purposive sampling will be used for selecting the research participant for the interview process. It is a type of non-probability sampling, in which the researcher relies on his own judgement to select the units (research participants or case studies) for the research. This sampling method is used, when there is requirement of low sample. The goal of the purposive sampling is to randomly create a sample and make generalizations from the sample of interest. It is commonly used in qualitative, exploratory research. The convenience sampling is another sampling method in which the researcher selects the research participants according to their proximity or convenience accessibility (Maxwell, 2012). In this method, the research participants are selected because they are easier to recruit in the research process. Data Collection The qualitative data cannot be analyzed through statistical means. The qualitative methods generate a mass of words which is needed to be summarized and described. In the qualitative methods, the researcher seeks relationships between different themes and relates behavior between the respondents. In contrast to quantitative data analysis methods, there is no software or formula based analysis techniques in the qualitative analysis (Malina, NrreklitSelto, 2011). The qualitative research is interpretive and subjective exercise and the researcher is closely associated with the process. The qualitative research method is used so that in-depth knowledge can be collected. The open coding is the process in which different concepts identified in the observed qualitative data are analyzed. The open coding is the process in which the qualitative data is coded, which describes, name and classify a phenomenon. The open coding can be used to divide the data and changing them into meaningful expressions. The researcher has used open coding as it is the simplest form of coding and can be used easily on the collected data. The axial coding is the dividing the core themes in the qualitative data analysis. It uses the combination ofinductive and deductive thinking. It evaluates the phenomenon under study, the conditions of the phenomenon and the consequences of the actions related to the phenomenon (Leavy, 2014). In the present case, open coding will be used to analyze the data obtained from the interview method. Analysis The open coding process will be used for the data analysis of the interview information. It encompasses a constant process of questioning and comparing the interview data, which removes the subjectivity introduced by the researcher. The open coding is different from the axial coding or the selective coding (Kallio, Pietil, Johnson Kangasniemi, 2016). It is not the process of using the data and yielding it to a mix of concepts, perceptions and different patterns. It is not focused on reducing information; however, it can organize the information into meaningful categories. Ethical considerations In research, ethics are important for maintaining the research integrity. The research ethics helps in differentiating the right actions from the wrong actions. The ethical standards prevent the fabrication of the data. It promotes authentic knowledge and prevention of error. The ethics allow the researcher to follow a collaborative approach for the research. Following ethics requires accountability, trust and fairness between all the people involved in the research. It is also necessary to protect the intellectual property rights of different contributors. The researcher has prohibited the falsification, fabrication and misinterpretation of data, which can misinterpret a real scenario. In order to maintain the intellectual property rights of the fellow researchers and mentors, the researcher has bestowed proper credentials for their contribution at the work. It also assures public accountability by making the researcher follow the government and the university policies on the protec tion of privacy of the human participants (Malterud, SiersmaGuassora, 2016). With public accountability, the researcher can gain funding for the research. It also assists the organization in maintaining the quality and integrity in the social research by protecting the information of the research participants. Limitations The research limitations refer to the influences, shortcomings, or conditions, which can impact on the outcomes of the research. The researcher cannot control these factors; therefore, it is important to identify these factors in the research. The research limitations can arise due to several factors. It is possible that the researcher is not able to form proper aims and objectives due to lack of experience. It is possible that the formed aims and objectives are broad, which are needed to be narrowed down (Robinson, 2014). The implementation of the primary research method can also be flawed, which can impact on the outcomes of the research. The sample size of the research is another issue. The sample size should not be very wide as it increases the complexity of the research. Other than that, the sample size should not be less as it will not provide results, which can be justified for the entire research population. The lack of past studies in the research area and limited scope of discussion are other issues, which can limit the credibility of the work. In the present research, the limitations are identified as the small sample size. A very small sample size is taken for the convenience; however, it is difficult to generalize the findings of the entire research. Other than that, the researcher has used only qualitative research methods. There are several limitations of the qualitative research methods (Hartwell Campion, 2016). The qualitative research is dependent upon the skills of the researcher. It can be easily influenced by the researchers bias and assessment. The research participants have more control over the data collection. References Graue, C. (2015). Qualitative data analysis.International Journal Of Sales, Retailing Marketing,4(9), 5-14. Hartwell, C. J., Campion, M. A. (2016). Getting on the same page: The effect of normative feedback interventions on structured interview ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology,101(6), 757. Kallio, H., Pietil, A. M., Johnson, M., Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi?structured interview guide.Journal of advanced nursing,72(12), 2954-2965. Kallio, H., Pietil, A. M., Johnson, M., Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi?structured interview guide.Journal of advanced nursing,72(12), 2954-2965. Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press. Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.Health promotion practice,16(4), 473-475. Malina, M. A., Nrreklit, H. S., Selto, F. H. (2011). Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research.Qualitative Research in Accounting Management,8(1), 59-71. Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power.Qualitative health research,26(13), 1753-1760. Maxwell, J.A. (2012). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. SAGE Publications. Merriam, S.B., Tisdell, E.J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley Sons. Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide.Qualitative Research in Psychology,11(1), 25-41. Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. SAGE.In your opinion, does the personal contact hold value in the retention of the employees?